Cliquez ici pour la version française
As Uganda approaches its 2026 presidential election, opposition leader Bobi Wine has urged citizens to prepare for what many now consider a near-certainty: an internet shutdown. Uganda has done this before—most notably during the 2016 and 2021 elections—cutting off social media and online communication nationwide under the banner of “security.”
At PhilanthroBit, we’ve long recognized that when centralized infrastructure is used as a political weapon, people seek alternatives that cannot be easily shut down. This time, however, something different is happening.
The Rise of Decentralized Communication
Wine has encouraged supporters to download Bitchat, a decentralized peer-to-peer messaging application developed by Jack Dorsey. Unlike conventional platforms, Bitchat does not rely on centralized servers or continuous internet access. Instead, it uses Bluetooth mesh networking to allow encrypted communication even during blackouts. As a result, interest in the app has surged dramatically inside Uganda, with downloads spiking as citizens anticipate information controls.
The motivation is straightforward: when centralized infrastructure is used as a political weapon, people seek alternatives that cannot be easily shut down. From a technological perspective, Bitchat is a messaging tool. From a societal perspective, it is something more important—it is evidence that people now intuitively understand the value of decentralized networks.
And that realization does not stop at communication.
Communication Blackouts Are a Symptom, Not the Disease
Internet shutdowns are rarely just about silencing speech. They are about control—control over coordination, over narratives, and critically, over economic activity. When governments restrict communication, financial restrictions often follow close behind: bank access is limited, transfers are delayed, accounts are frozen, and capital flight is criminalized.
Bitcoin was designed for exactly the same class of failure that Bitchat is now responding to. Where Bitchat removes centralized points of failure in communication, Bitcoin removes centralized points of failure in money.
This is where Bitcoin enters the picture. Bitcoin was designed for exactly the same class of failure that Bitchat is now responding to. Where Bitchat removes centralized points of failure in communication, Bitcoin removes centralized points of failure in money. Both systems are permissionless. Both are peer-to-peer. Both function precisely because no authority can unilaterally turn them off.
Bitcoin Is the Economic Layer of Decentralization
At PhilanthroBit, we view stories like Uganda’s not as isolated political news, but as real-world stress tests for centralized systems. When citizens prepare for blackouts, they are implicitly acknowledging a deeper truth: reliance on single points of control is no longer viable.
Bitcoin in Crisis Environments
- A savings technology: Protecting value from currency debasement and political instability
- A remittance rail: Enabling cross-border support when traditional channels fail
- A humanitarian funding mechanism: Delivering aid directly without intermediaries
- A tool for organizational resilience: Maintaining operations during infrastructure failures
Unlike banks or payment platforms, Bitcoin does not require approval to participate. Unlike national currencies, it cannot be inflated for political convenience. Unlike aid intermediaries, it does not decide who is worthy of access. If someone can run a Bitcoin wallet—even intermittently—they can store value, receive support from abroad, and transact outside systems that may be compromised or politicized.
This is not speculation. In environments where elections are contested, currencies are debased, and infrastructure is unstable, Bitcoin is already being used as a savings technology, a remittance rail, a humanitarian funding mechanism, and a tool for organizational resilience. Just as Bitchat allows messages to route around censorship, Bitcoin allows value to route around institutional failure.
The Ecosystem Matters
Bitcoin is often discussed as a single protocol, but its real-world utility comes from its surrounding ecosystem. Lightning enables instant, low-cost payments. Open-source wallets allow self-custody without identity requirements. Offline signing, satellite relays, and mesh-adjacent technologies reduce dependence on constant connectivity.
Bitcoin for GoodSM
When we say “Bitcoin for GoodSM,” we are not making a moral claim about technology. We are making an empirical one.
Good systems are systems that do not fail catastrophically when abused, do not privilege insiders over participants, and do not require trust in actors with conflicting incentives. Bitcoin meets those criteria.
In other words, Bitcoin is not optimized for convenience during calm periods. It is optimized for reliability during disruption. That design choice is why Bitcoin adoption tends to rise in moments of stress rather than stability.
The growing interest in decentralized tools like Bitchat should not be viewed as a fringe response to political tension. It is part of a broader pattern: people are actively choosing networks that serve users rather than rulers. Bitcoin is the monetary expression of that same choice.
Looking Forward
Once people understand why decentralized communication matters, they rarely need much convincing about why decentralized money does too. The Uganda election scenario demonstrates that censorship resistance is not a theoretical concept—it’s a practical necessity for millions of people.
As a Bitcoin-first public benefit corporation, PhilanthroBit believes that Bitcoin represents the greatest tool ever invented to advance human freedom by fixing broken financial systems. The same principles that make Bitchat valuable—permissionless access, peer-to-peer operation, and resistance to shutdown—apply equally to Bitcoin.
The choice between centralized control and decentralized freedom is becoming clearer every day. In Uganda and around the world, people are choosing freedom.
Block, Inc. Bitcoin Ecosystem for Good
At PhilanthroBit, we believe that Bitcoin isn’t just a financial asset—it’s a tool for global empowerment. To understand where the “Bitcoin for GoodSM” movement is heading, we have to look at the pioneers building the infrastructure for a more equitable future.
Enter Block, Inc. Led by Jack Dorsey (co-founder of Twitter and a dedicated Bitcoin advocate), Block is more than a fintech giant; it is a “full-stack” Bitcoin powerhouse. They aren’t just dipping their toes in the water—they are building the very tools that allow nonprofits and individuals alike to achieve true financial sovereignty.
The Evolution: From Square to Block
The journey began in 2009 with Square, a company that revolutionized how small businesses accept payments. But Dorsey saw a bigger mission. As early as 2014, Square began integrating Bitcoin into its ecosystem through Cash App—its most famous subsidiary—enabling everyday people to access the world’s most inclusive monetary network.
In 2021, the company officially rebranded to Block, Inc. This wasn’t just a name change; it was a declaration of intent. By “doubling down” on Bitcoin, Block signaled its vision of a future where the Bitcoin blockchain serves as the foundational layer for global commerce and social impact.
A Full-Stack Ecosystem for Social Good
Block’s subsidiaries represent a holistic approach to the Bitcoin lifecycle, providing the tools our nonprofit partners need to thrive in a digital-first world:
- Cash App: Bridging the gap between traditional finance and Bitcoin, making it easy for donors and organizations to move value instantly.
- Square: Continuing to empower local merchants and nonprofits with specialized payment terminal technology.
- Bitkey: A self-custody hardware wallet that puts the “keys” to financial freedom directly into the hands of the user—eliminating the need for predatory intermediaries.
- Mining & Open Source: Block is even building the hardware and software that secures the network, ensuring Bitcoin remains a public good for everyone, everywhere.
“At its core, Block’s mission aligns with PhilanthroBit’s: using technology to create economic empowerment. When we talk about ‘Bitcoin for GoodSM,’ we are talking about leveraging Bitcoin’s growing infrastructure such as what Block is building today.” – Pierre Gaudet, CEO
Why Bitcoin for Social Impact?
Bitcoin isn’t just a digital currency—it’s a financial tool that empowers organizations with long-term resilience, transparency, and censorship resistance. At PhilanthroBit, we believe Bitcoin is the greatest tool ever invented to advance human freedom by fixing broken financial systems.
Learn About Bitcoin for GoodSMDiscover how nonprofits and social enterprises use Bitcoin for treasury management, tax-smart donations, and sustainable funding.
